I look forward to the 2nd part of the article where you will share more perspective. The article is rather quite misleading as it is and I would have described it as a classic case of "lying with statistics" but I don't know if the writer(s) honestly wrote what they truly believe is the truth.
I look forward to the 2nd part of the article where you will share more perspective. The article is rather quite misleading as it is and I would have described it as a classic case of "lying with statistics" but I don't know if the writer(s) honestly wrote what they truly believe is the truth.